MSI PRO B660-A DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D59
MotherboardMSI PRO B660-A DDR4  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 23:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 223
2-Core 430
125% 243 Pts
4-Core 884
8-Core 1,757
156% 1,321 Pts
64-Core 3,011
186% 3,011 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 121%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 115
Parallax 121
106% 122 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 85.6
84% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
239GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 180
Write 156
Mixed 104
SusWrite 106
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GVRB Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GVRB Kingston KHX2400C15D4/832GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 25.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO B660-A DDR4 (MS-7D59) Builds (Compare 1,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B660-A DDR4 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $735
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback