HP h9-1020fr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h9-1020fr  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 18:36
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$140
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 151
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 400
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AB5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 1%
AMD HD 6850
MSI(1462 2520) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 14.3
13% 16.2 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
658GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 425 432 429 416 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 456
Mixed 436
SusWrite 422
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 42.8
138% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 322
246% 334 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
502GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 71 71 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 99.5
Write 38.7
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 72
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
85GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 83.7
Write 83.3
Mixed 62
SusWrite 56.8
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
858GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 133
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 130
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB
36GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 41 40 41 39 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 50
Write 37.6
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 38.6
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1020fr Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP h9-1020fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback