Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B560M-A (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210712
Uptime	13.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115 46,609 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 80.3 1-Core 149 2-Core 282 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 862 81% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250 43,922 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Gigabyte(1458 40AA) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.2% Very good	Lighting 103 Reflection 82 Parallax 86.9 84% 90.7 fps	MRender 83 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 62.8 58% 71.9 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 491 Write 239 Mixed 225 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 37.3 116% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 176 150% 228 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 30GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 133 134 120 116 90 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 392 Mixed 356 SusWrite 160 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 49.6 168% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 316 245% 336 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 100GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 102 100 101 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 144 Write 110 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 101 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 23.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 20 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $115Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	1,199x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1,132x
Core i5-11400Intel $120Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	1,099x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1,095x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	659x
RTX 2060Nvidia $287Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	380x

SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	238x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	215x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	205x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	441x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	308x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	283x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16