Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201126
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '23 at 09:44
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 230 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 570 58% 470 Pts	64-Core 612 38% 612 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	45% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 63.1 Parallax 57.7 48% 59.8 fps	MRender 42.2 Gravity 52.6 Splatting 50.3 40% 48.4 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTF 512GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: A0V4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 983 755 49 844 1006 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 398 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 757 82% 360 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 17.4 45% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 463 DQ Write 657 DQ Mixed 640 461% 587 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 178%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 90GB free Firmware: JU002J SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 77 77 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 135 Write 107 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 77.8 69% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.6% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 19.2 66% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 17.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,095x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,060x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	766x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	333x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	216x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	564x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	306x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	109x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16