HP 860-030

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 860-030  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 00:29
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 122
2-Core 221
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 632
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
MSI(1462 397D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 102
Parallax 126
111% 121 fps
MRender 90.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 91.1
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 100%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 480GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 296 288 277 289 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 443
Write 417
Mixed 302
SusWrite 292
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 25.7
88% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 122
111% 166 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 24GB
2666, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 16
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-030 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP 860-030

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback