Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150325
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '23 at 00:12
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$85 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 126 55% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 343 36% 286 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.9% Above average	Lighting 72.7 Reflection 66.9 Parallax 100 59% 79.9 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 83 Splatting 53.4 55% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$142 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 297GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 40 65 72 83 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 71.4 Write 78.3 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 65.8 51% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 73%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 42GB free Firmware: 02.03E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 60 61 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 71.3 Write 78.6 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 60.3 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 729GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 157 159 159 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 147 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 156 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2.5TB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.4% Very poor	Read 51 Write 37.6 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 20.7 46% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 16%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 730GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 114 117 119 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 99 Write 104 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 116 136% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 60%
Initio INIC-3609 3TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free, PID 3940 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 52 Write 37.1 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 20.4 43% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 68%
WD easystore 264D 8TB 977 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 267GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 98 100 95 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 119 Write 137 Mixed 94.1 SusWrite 99.3 152% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.2 251% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991677B (998677B) BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 991677B (998677B) BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.6 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	4x
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
GTX 1650Nvidia $141Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	3x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	4x
Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBNvme $45Bench 187%, 23,539 samples	2x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $105Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350