Lenovo 20DE001PUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20DE001PUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20DE001PUS
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 20:42
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7000 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 45.5
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 26.9
24% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 33.8
8-Core 31.7
4% 32.8 Pts
64-Core 25.9
2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5110) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.7
0% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 89 76 84 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 68.6
Write 101
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 87.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF CT51264BF160B.C16F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20DE001PUS Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20DE001PUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback