Acer TravelMate P215-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate P215-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Leo_KL
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 192
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 475
52% 410 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 132B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.9
6% 5.67 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN730 SDB 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 512 499 497 508 507 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,068
Write 1,434
Mixed 1,215
SusWrite 510
238% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 45.9
168% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 686
523% 711 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 158%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P215-51 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P215-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback