Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2195 105 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 189 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 701 62% 529 Pts	64-Core 1,890 117% 1,890 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 89%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 19,561 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KHA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 432 412 428 385 355 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 693 Write 652 Mixed 876 SusWrite 409 148% 657 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 37.9 154% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 744 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 617 435% 560 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 170%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 4x8GB 1,278 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 46.6 MC Mixed 30.2 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 9.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	369x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	346x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	328x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	273x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	88x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16