Microelectronics G902

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G902  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 15:32
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 305
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 1,178
107% 897 Pts
64-Core 2,132
132% 2,132 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 252
Parallax 281
225% 270 fps
MRender 313
Gravity 229
Splatting 172
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1388 1354 780 745 745 738 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,630
Write 1618
Mixed 1363
SusWrite 958
313% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 54.4
205% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 858
639% 848 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 224%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416F82-3200D NMUD416E86-3200D NMUD416F82-3200D NMUD416E86-3200D 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 38.8
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 115%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G902 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G902

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback