Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 15:03
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 170
2-Core 330
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 625
8-Core 934
97% 779 Pts
64-Core 1075
66% 1075 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Zotac(19DA 1704) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 194
Parallax 134
125% 160 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
124% 158 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 119%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 121 448 57 7.2 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 492
Write 430
Mixed 11
SusWrite 136
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.4
41% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 92%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
311GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 130 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 108
Write 97.6
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 131
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 34
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback