HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-ee1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-ee1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88C2
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 03:40
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 812
83% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 88C2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02.06
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 29.9
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 21.3
16% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,503
Write 1,434
Mixed 1,224
309% 1,387 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 53
174% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 836
627% 843 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-H3200GST Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.2% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 22
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY x360 Convertible 15-ee1xxx Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-ee1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback