Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	43% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 9.9 2-Core 84.8 31% 51.1 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 160 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 170 11% 170 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5036) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	2.98% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 4.4 3% 3.17 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 4 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 401 Write 374 Mixed 296 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 27.3 89% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 220 170% 234 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 32GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 234 Write 31.4 Mixed 48.9 94% 105 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 2.8 546% 7.67 MB/s	DQ Read 16.1 DQ Write 19.6 DQ Mixed 4.6 883% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Micron 16KTF2G64HZ-1G6A1 20GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.7% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16