Performance Results


Gaming 226% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 214% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C02
Motherboard	MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220723
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$238 20,824 User benchmarks, average bench 104% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 157 2-Core 298 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 558 8-Core 955 92% 756 Pts	64-Core 1,250 77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 111%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$780 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% Asus(1043 88A3) CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	236% Outstanding	Lighting 342 Reflection 327 Parallax 344 279% 338 fps	MRender 468 Gravity 293 Splatting 212 252% 324 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1010 742 736 725 716 708 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 2,442 Write 2,159 Mixed 1,712 SusWrite 773 396% 1,772 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 80.8 269% 94.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,167 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 1,044 781% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 355%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 208GB free Firmware: UG5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 140 74 219 218 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 443 Write 384 Mixed 304 SusWrite 168 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 19 70% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 89.3 DQ Mixed 45.6 50% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS545016B9SA02 160GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 14GB free Firmware: PBBAC60Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 33 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 38.2 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 32.5 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 39,970 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 29.4 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 25 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 27.8 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,452x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1,300x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,120x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	654x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	531x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	529x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,933x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	980x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	758x

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $504

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16