HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8308
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201102
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 16:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 206
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 568
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
HP(103C 83CC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 181
Parallax 174
135% 173 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 169
Splatting 117
111% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1726 1806 1826 1977 1977 1623 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,084
Write 1961
Mixed 1,942
SusWrite 1,822
440% 1,953 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 62
200% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 682
505% 670 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 287%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback