Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 11:34
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 622
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.1
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 229 261 250 256 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 853
Write 485
Mixed 173
SusWrite 261
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 57.1
149% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 201
260% 469 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 125%
Great: 244%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 418 432 439 432 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 393
Mixed 399
SusWrite 430
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 39.8
134% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 282
238% 346 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 100%
Great: 123%
PATRIOT 640GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 67 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 33.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 67.6
31% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35%
Great: 54%
PATRIOT 640GB
259GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 55 57 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 58.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 55.3
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 54%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
337GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 75.7
Write 77
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 77
94% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
639GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 78.2
Write 71.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 95.7
102% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
728GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 34.1
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 35.2
44% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
=>04 F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 28
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback