Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_A509FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_A509FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FA
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210205
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 02:30
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 4305U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 43.3
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 61.2
30% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 81.3
8-Core 86.1
11% 83.7 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Asus(1043 1961) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 179 204 455 432 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 541
Write 322
Mixed 589
SusWrite 323
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 32
114% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 158
122% 167 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 0.3
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_A509FA Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_A509FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback