Hasee N9x0TD_TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHasee N9x0TD_TF  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N9x0TD_TF
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 18:41
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 203
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 582
68% 530 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 951D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 106
Parallax 114
90% 110 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 107
Splatting 96.4
96% 122 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E256 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C282102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 256 266 270 271 271 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 332
Write 354
Mixed 338
SusWrite 274
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 35.5
109% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 123
156% 279 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 105%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 109 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 122
Write 80.8
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 106
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
160% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FJ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 16.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N9x0TD_TF Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Hasee N9x0TD_TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback