Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 13:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 623
70% 548 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.9% Good
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 74.2
72% 82.3 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 78
Splatting 69.9
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 190 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 447
Write 224
Mixed 297
SusWrite 73.5
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 22.2
83% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 40.2
77% 152 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
460GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 413 391 432 440 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 409
Mixed 391
SusWrite 415
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 44.2
139% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 293
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback