Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030Y 38 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.88% Terrible	Memory 8.88 1-Core 13.8 2-Core 25.1 9% 15.9 Pts	4-Core 28.6 8-Core 27.3 4% 28 Pts	64-Core 27 2% 27 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz) 3,426 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0604) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 2 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LJT-128L6G-11 M.2 2260 128GB 580 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: DJ7110C SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 90 53 101 140 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.8% Very poor	Read 96 Write 138 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 95.5 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 5.2 16% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x2GB 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 414 10% 414 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 3,426 samples	31x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 72%, 1,324 samples	14x
LJT-128L6G-11 M.2 2260 128GBLiteonitBench 73%, 580 samples	12x
128GB 128GBShijiBench 57%, 25 samples	3x