Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 07:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 712
66% 553 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 87
Parallax 82.3
73% 86.3 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 56.9
60% 75.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM32.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 263
Write 1,476
Mixed 209
148% 649 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 38.5
138% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 615
451% 600 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 253%
Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB
67GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 75.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 55.1
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 24.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback