Toshiba Satellite L300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite L300  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 10:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 48
33% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 48.7
6% 48.5 Pts
64-Core 49.2
3% 49.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 FF67) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1883
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.35 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.31 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.29%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Stacja dysków 500GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 81.7
Write 79.8
Mixed 13.1
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.16
56% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L300 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback