bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory22.2 GB free of 24.4141 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3438 x 1327 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 58
1-Core 117
2-Core 264
76% 146 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 452
56% 425 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.4.2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 114
36% 68.9 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 42.5
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,525
Write 1,840
Mixed 2,013
472% 2,126 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 56.3
190% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 274
204% 270 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-256MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-32MB Virtual RAM VMW-8MB 24GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192, 256, 128, 32, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.3% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 26.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 6.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback