TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 13:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 71.7
40% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 139
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 35.7%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.06%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW240A3H 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB3i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 217 224 209 224 213 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 337
Write 241
Mixed 242
SusWrite 216
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 29.5
101% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 214
164% 224 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 68.2%
 Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 31.3%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel  $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples595x
Core i5-3360MIntel  $594Bench 54%, 5,754 samples197x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples140x
GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples1,222x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples173x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples9x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples46x
520 Series 180GBIntel  $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples26x
RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples36x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples32x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples28x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback