MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 178
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 246
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7996) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 333
Write 57.9
Mixed 290
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 32.5
45% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
16GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37
Write 14.7
Mixed 18.7
26% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
98% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.4% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 2,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback