Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 32.7 1-Core 51.9 2-Core 67.6 30% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 81.3 8-Core 91.1 11% 86.2 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SDVPM21910256 256GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0524A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 270 264 293 296 319 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 358 Write 322 Mixed 308 SusWrite 286 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 11.6 75% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 29.6 54% 105 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	4x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	4x

SSD
SDVPM21910256 256GBBench 56%, 38 samples	4x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $35	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16