Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Memory 20.7 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 20 13% 19.1 Pts	4-Core 25.3 8-Core 28.5 4% 26.9 Pts	64-Core 8.7 0% 8.7 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9CC7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.67% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.1 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.67% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 35 30 30 29 31 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.5% Poor	Read 186 Write 141 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 47.9 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 5.3 25% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 73.4 DQ Write 47.4 DQ Mixed 24.9 28% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde Team-Ind-1600 1x4GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.7% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 315 13% 315 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	5x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	2x
PX-256M5S 256GBPlextorBench 82%, 2,817 samples	1x
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	1x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
Team-Ind-1600 1x4GBUndeBench 17%, 96 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16