Asus X556URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X556URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556URK
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 07:08
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 79.6
52% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 10.1
21% 120 Pts
64-Core 15.6
1% 15.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6.3
4% 6.67 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 9
Splatting 8.7
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 319 322 356 375 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 469
Write 370
Mixed 383
SusWrite 295
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 13.8
98% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 16.7
66% 145 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X556URK Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556URK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback