Asus PRIME B360M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 21:47
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 56
2-Core 204
60% 111 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 390
47% 362 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 112
Parallax 195
94% 141 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 137
Splatting 76.7
82% 103 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,173
Write 1217
Mixed 1018
254% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 52
174% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 922
688% 918 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 228%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
283GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 387 394 400 402 406 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 299
Write 341
Mixed 312
SusWrite 389
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 22.2
67% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 119
101% 146 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V-Color TC416G24D817 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B360M-K Builds (Compare 2,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback