Asus Zenbook UX3402ZA_Q409ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Zenbook UX3402ZA_Q409ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX3402ZA
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors, , , 2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 52.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 265
82% 156 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 600
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1E02) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 12.7
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 13
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PCIe SSD 1TB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 677 666 691 697 695 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 2,212
Mixed 552
SusWrite 706
260% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 49.6
240% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1269
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 964
724% 982 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 204%
Great: 493%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 43.6
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 21.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zenbook UX3402ZA_Q409ZA Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Asus Zenbook UX3402ZA_Q409ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback