Gigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 16:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Memory 30.1
1-Core 14.8
2-Core 21.7
16% 22.2 Pts
4-Core 37.8
8-Core 55.7
6% 46.8 Pts
64-Core 68.5
4% 68.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 240 262 279 284 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 215
Write 44.4
Mixed 135
SusWrite 240
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 12.2
41% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 114
85% 113 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
359GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 107 154 162 147 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 139
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown N3D04F1333E-512N 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.36% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AM1M-S2H Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback