Acer ConceptD CN917-71P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer ConceptD CN917-71P  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL RaptorC_CFS
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 14:02
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 264
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 816
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Acer(1025 1386) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 172
Parallax 164
126% 163 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 143
Splatting 142
126% 156 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 121%
Great: 108%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SED SDAQNTW-1T00 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1684 1394 1397 1402 1404 1400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,831
Write 2125
Mixed 1,849
SusWrite 1,447
409% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.1
189% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 821
621% 840 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 258%
Great: 285%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8ME-16 Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CN917-71P Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Acer ConceptD CN917-71P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback