HP ProBook 640 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 640 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2101
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181107
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 22:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 83.5
46% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 135
15% 121 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
170GB free
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 113 85 41 50 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 366
Write 226
Mixed 287
SusWrite 114
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 21.5
77% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 171
131% 178 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 106%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 67 56 34 24 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 640 G1 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 640 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback