Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 146 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 386 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.00 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 93.1 Reflection 108 Parallax 96.8 76% 99.1 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 94.2 Splatting 95.8 78% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM6C.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 150 137 88 64 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Jmicron Generic 750GB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 415GB free Firmware: 2101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 51.7 Write 27.1 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 27.4 23% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Winbond W25X/Q32 44GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4266, 33 MHz 8192, 36864 MB Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

RAM
Winbond W25X/Q32 44GBUnknownBench 38%, 266 samples	13x
MXIC 25L3205 40GBUnknownBench 33%, 50 samples	9x
MXIC 25L3205 44GBUnknownBench 33%, 74 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16