TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 235%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive620% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 18:41
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 206
2-Core 411
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 819
8-Core 1544
141% 1,182 Pts
64-Core 2,793
173% 2,793 Pts
Poor: 107% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 298
Parallax 328
253% 312 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 254
Splatting 185
207% 264 fps
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 210%
 Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 53 61 58 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
620% Outstanding
Read 6982
Write 57.4
Mixed 108
SusWrite 54
374% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 835
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 7
1,276% 282 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑
This bench: 620%
 Great: 255%
MANIX4000GB-G4SS 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 536 552 417 456 503 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,741
Write 939
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 492
249% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 37.5
149% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,615
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 176
296% 623 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑
This bench: 182%
 Great: 466%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
860GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 350 357 324 335 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,518
Write 1,368
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 339
238% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 56.7
197% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 148
201% 392 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑
This bench: 165%
 Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
154% Outstanding
MC Read 61.2
MC Write 61.4
MC Mixed 59.3
173% 60.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 26.5
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 129% ↑
This bench: 154%
 Great: 168%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 1,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Core i9-12900KIntel  $277Bench 117%, 66,991 samples382x
Core i7-12700KIntel  $215Bench 114%, 78,749 samples300x
Core i7-12700KFIntel  $189Bench 114%, 70,812 samples174x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples199x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $580Bench 204%, 155,335 samples199x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia  $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples127x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples219x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples189x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples58x
RAM
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples108x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GBGBench 172%, 21,264 samples106x
Co Ltd GP-ARS32G52D5 2x16GBGIGA-BYTEBench 154%, 716 samples89x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback