Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 40.4 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 72.5 30% 50.4 Pts	4-Core 88 8-Core 107 13% 97.6 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5064) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4541 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.9 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1001 128GB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4133001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 94 95 93 94 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 388 Write 328 Mixed 287 SusWrite 98.7 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 28.7 99% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 170 133% 185 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x8GB 1,334 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core™i7-6300UIntel®Bench 32%, 2 samples	2x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	1x
Celeron N3450 1.1GHzIntelBench 34%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 157 samples	2x
Basics SSD 256GBValuetechBench 61%, 50 samples	1x
SD8SN8U128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 70%, 1,303 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16