Asrock Z690 Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 219%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 239%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Extreme  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 01:46
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 199
2-Core 403
119% 229 Pts
4-Core 795
8-Core 1,503
137% 1,149 Pts
64-Core 2,170
134% 2,170 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 251
Parallax 509
194% 333 fps
MRender 396
Gravity 207
Splatting 324
253% 309 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 191%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,093
Write 3,493
Mixed 3,116
725% 3,234 MB/s
4K Read 90.6
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 132
433% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 2,130
DQ Write 1,908
DQ Mixed 2,028
1,518% 2,022 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Samsung MZQL21T9HCJR-00A07 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: GDC5302Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2675 2675 2675 2675 2675 2675 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 2,426
Write 2,675
Mixed 2,448
SusWrite 2675
578% 2,556 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 89.7
328% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 2,085
DQ Write 1,974
DQ Mixed 2,016
1,517% 2,025 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 451%
Great: 460%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 36
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 30.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 106%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z690 Extreme Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback