Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.5
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 19:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 66
1-Core 180
2-Core 313
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 861
88% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,377
85% 1,377 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1174) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 126
Parallax 28.9
20% 59.8 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 21.8
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1949 2086 2136 2097 366 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2123
Write 2,079
Mixed 1699
SusWrite 1,481
415% 1,846 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 107
364% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,699
DQ Write 1,335
DQ Mixed 1,146
958% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 356%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 17.4
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.5 Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback