Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 79 2-Core 175 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 455 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 40.8 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 38.1 33% 39.8 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 27.2 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD240GXACTT-003Z 240GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: XQ61.2GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 125 97 98 102 102 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 453 Write 321 Mixed 361 SusWrite 144 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 30.7 119% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 203 174% 257 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-RD 4x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 32.3 97% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373