IT PB50_70RF,RD,RC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIT PB50_70RF,RD,RC  (all builds)
MotherboardIT PB50_70RF,RD,RC
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 668
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Clevo(1558 67D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 135
Parallax 86.2
75% 105 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 113
Splatting 103
101% 127 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
447GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 868 874 883 895 496 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 923
Mixed 859
SusWrite 816
222% 991 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 54.5
181% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 345
298% 430 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 182%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 24 32 38 44 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 55.9
Write 115
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 41.7
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.3
106% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
3GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.3
Write 128
Mixed 94.5
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
217% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 25.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PB50_70RF,RD,RC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: IT PB50_70RF,RD,RC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback