| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Studio XPS 9100 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 05DN3X |
| Memory | 17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101021 |
| Uptime | 8.8 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '23 at 20:31 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.2%
Good
|
59% 92.5 Pts
|
29% 228 Pts
|
17% 277 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
107%
Outstanding
|
110% 140 fps
|
104% 128 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 140 121 118 173 MB/s
|
55.7%
Above average
|
37% 166 MB/s
|
94% 30.8 MB/s
|
148% 198 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HM250JI 250GB
200GB free
Firmware: HS100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 47 49 49 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
32% 43.2 MB/s
|
102% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 970GB
489GB free
Firmware: MCC3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 14 17 16 17 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.6%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
59% 67.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 422 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 9100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 196x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 90x |
| Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $433 |