HP 860-030

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 860-030  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 19:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 204
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 583
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
MSI(1462 397D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 102
Parallax 130
110% 122 fps
MRender 90.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 90.2
78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 480GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 349 301 297 293 295 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 463
Write 448
Mixed 340
SusWrite 319
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 27.9
92% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 29.3
84% 177 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 185 190 189 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 150
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 189
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 24GB
2666, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-030 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP 860-030

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback