Fujitsu FMVD12001

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu FMVD12001  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU JIB85Y4
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150305
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 13:57
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 473
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Fujitsu(10CF 17C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Fujitsu(10CF 1932) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 10.2
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 13.3
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R631D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 417
Mixed 347
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 36.4
127% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 193
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 211%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
104GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 60.4
Mixed 65.1
93% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.6
144% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Other CT51264BA160B.C16F M378B5173QH0-CK0 Other CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 15.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVD12001 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Fujitsu FMVD12001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback