Asus P7F-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7F-M  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 120
56% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 284
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Sapphire(174B 353E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 75.4
47% 63.4 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 42.1
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 71 70 70 67 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 125
Write 113
Mixed 117
SusWrite 71.2
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 20.5
67% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 114
88% 120 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
9GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 51 51 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 45.2
Write 50.9
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 50.4
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 35%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
104GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 65 66 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 94.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 64.4
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
177GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 111 97 111 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 108
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7F-M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7F-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $255
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback