Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 51.9 36% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 97.5 8-Core 128 14% 113 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 128GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 94 68 46 35 49 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.3% Poor	Read 83.5 Write 72.5 Mixed 78.1 SusWrite 61.3 17% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 10.8 38% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 37.7 DQ Mixed 24 21% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 96%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25 14,710 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 8GB free Firmware: 1AC0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 73 78 77 76 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 83.4 Write 86.3 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 77.2 54% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 62%
Excelsto r Technology 165GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 38GB free Firmware: P22O SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 51 52 51 52 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 44.9 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 51.3 35% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB 28h SDRAM Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Sol id State Dis 256GBSpccBench 49%, 6 samples	2x
Sata III 256GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,573 samples	1x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $111

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16