| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171205 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 26 '23 at 19:54 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 74% |
PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
50.3%
Above average
|
50% 86.2 Pts
|
35% 260 Pts
|
17% 280 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
27% 35 fps
|
24% 30.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 47 55 38 25 34 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
29% 39.4 MB/s
|
69% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905678-058.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
61.4%
Good
|
65% 22.8 GB/s
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
28% 140 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,228 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 167x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 157x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 94x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 91x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $239 |