ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell XPS 13 9380

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Dell XPS 13 9380 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0KTW76
Memory	3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221216
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 52.9 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 122 47% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 194 22% 175 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 08AF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2004 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 4.7 4% 4.87 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.4 4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 6%
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% PowerColor(148C 2398) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.06 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.5% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 132 Parallax 169 86% 135 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 146 Splatting 82.6 88% 110 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pc611 NVMe SK hynix 512GB 3,469 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11000111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 199 190 301 327 332 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 865 Write 625 Mixed 644 SusWrite 274 134% 602 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 26.7 98% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 226 166% 221 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 273%
FANTOM ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1.5TB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 26 29 29 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 30.6 Mixed 18 SusWrite 28.1 36% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GB 10,159 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical XPS 13 9380 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 13 9380

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	423x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	74x
Core i7-8665UIntelBench 60%, 10,156 samples	53x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	548x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	74x
NVMe SK hynix 256GBPc401Bench 118%, 9,137 samples	51x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	45x

RAM
H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 10,159 samples	213x
K4EBE304EC-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 4,157 samples	172x
K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 8,402 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback