MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190930
Uptime9 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 11:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 131
54% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 196
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7A36) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.40.22
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.1
4% 6.8 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen08sm22ar128sdk 128GB 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 108 102 89 76 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 426
Write 311
Mixed 354
SusWrite 92.4
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 23.9
97% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 24
55% 112 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
768GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 165 165 164 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 142
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 166
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix Kingston 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 28.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback