Exper ACTIVEDEX299

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemExper ACTIVEDEX299  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170921
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 03:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 184
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 294
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Asus(1043 864E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.9
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240 240GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 74 7.7 8.5 68 262 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 435
Write 180
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 102
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 18.8
85% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 0.7
54% 129 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
418GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 151 150 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 177
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 150
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 859B CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACTIVEDEX299 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Exper ACTIVEDEX299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback