Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 19:12
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,064
95% 803 Pts
64-Core 2151
133% 2151 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 144
Parallax 225
109% 168 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 154
Splatting 97.7
99% 124 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 11 47 65 69 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50% Average
Read 454
Write 390
Mixed 304
SusWrite 77.4
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 15.4
75% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 32.3
44% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
37GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 98 97 94 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 163
Write 118
Mixed 132
SusWrite 97.9
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 33.1
126% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 83.1
75% 114 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
23GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 182 180 183 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 129
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 181
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
169GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 129 133 134 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 130
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 77%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
36GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 138 138 139 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 126
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 137
152% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
149% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD642JJ 640GB
85GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 102
Write 115
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 114
133% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 37%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.8
Write 54.5
Mixed 39.7
62% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3533 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 40.3
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 39.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback